As I mentioned in an earlier post
, we've started a group discussion about the idea of a Big Society Social App Store
, and there's now one on social tech in Big Society
. Quite a few new people have joined this community expressing an interest in these topics (welcome!) so it seems a good time to provide a general update on Big Society, and see who might like to start some fresh discussions, here or in the groups. Any thoughts?Below is a piece summarising recent posts at socialreporter.com
Here's a catch-up on the posts I've written over the past few days about Big Society, with a few more thoughts on networking and knowledge ecologies. All posts on the topic are here
As a reminder, the Big Society idea
, launched pre-election by the Conservatives and now a centrepiece of coalition Government policy, is about a smaller state matched by more powers for local communities and encouragement for volunteering, social action, social enterprise and other forms of nonprofits.
The post There is no Big Society Big Plan - but that's no bad thing
said there's a lot starting to happen under the Big Society banner, but it is a mistake to see it as an old-style government programme. The idea is that things emerge more organically, without any one Minister - or anyone else - being in charge. Fair enough for something aiming for wide-spread action by many interests, but the problem is that no-one really understands what Big Society stands for, or how to join in. There's no voice, no story, and consequently a lot of rubbishing.
In Since there's no Big Society Big Plan, can we expect Big Process? P...
I examined the idea of a Big Process to develop some clear purpose and shared vision, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, but concluded that was unlikely to happen. It's not really feasible in the current political climate, and probably not the sort of thing Downing Street would want to orchestrate anyway.
Networking Big Society - or maybe some knowledge gardening
suggested another approach to get the best out of Big Society: build on the wealth of activity already supported by many community and voluntary sector networks, while also adding innovative methods for mass engagement. Help community organisers and anyone engaged in social action make good use of the social technologies now widely available, but under-used by traditional activists.
(I should declare some self-interest here. I'm working part-time with the Big Society Network, and this is the sort of programme of network-weaving I would like to work on ... joining up conversations, helping people make sense of what's going on, brokering new opportunities. While it would be possible simply to write lots about the great projects already underway, it would be counter-productive to try and pull these under a Big Society banner without asking. If people want to add the term Big Society to their project stories, that's up to them - anything else is co-option. Certainly not empowerment).
As I mentioned in the last post
, we have a forum to explore social tech and networking here on Social by Social
, and that's probably the best place for detail.
So, in summary, what I think that what we should try (and I'll come back to the we) is development of a rich mix of online and offline conversations, stories, wants, offers and inspirations created by those who have been in this field for years, and some fresh voices too.
I don't think it is good enough just to leave it to the existing big networks and organisations, although they have a huge part to play. They will naturally enough look to safeguard their own jobs first, and serve their existing members, particularly as their funding is being cut. The community, voluntary and social enterprise worlds are jungles, and it can be very risky to move from your niche and try and innovate too fast. Some will - bnut I guess most won't.
Nor can Big Society Network achieve the change solely through programmes like Your Square Mile, detailed here
, however ambitious. Support will be needed from existing organisations and networks.
How might we proceed? That's for discussion on the forum I that mentioned, but here's some starter ideas.
Develop a core group of people interested in evolving a Big Society ecology - something more like the mesh in this diagram that a top-down network that's really just a mailing list, or a simple joining up what's there already .
Agree some values to underpin activities. I'll promote open, transparent, participatory; standing on the side of newcomers, not just existing friends and members; blending online and offline; where possible co-designing new projects.
Start some collaborative projects: we already have ideas for a Social App Store
, and a group developing around the excellent, independent, Big Society in the North
are thinking about what it takes to be a 21st century community organiser.
In addition, there's a great opportunity for the Big Society Network, which is currently rethinking its web site, to develop something that would assist in the the joining up, and also showcasing great projects and ideas, where people agree. I'll be talking with others in the team, and report back.
Meanwhile, what's you ideas for joining up, making sense, help people do good stuff?
: Toby Blume, on Twitter, suggests adding equality and fairness as Big Society values, which prompted a link
to work on Strong Communities, Bigger Society that Community Links did with the Chain Reaction Network.